Search for: "John Doe Contractors"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
The contractor, known only as "John Doe," asserted in his lawsuit [Reuters report] that Rumsfeld was personally liable for his injuries because Rumsfeld developed and implemented the policies that led to Doe's... [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:22 am
The OFCCP is on a war footing with federal contractors, OFCCP expert John C. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
The OFCCP is on a war footing with federal contractors, OFCCP expert John C. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:14 pm
An employer does not generally have to withhold or pay any taxes on payments to independent contractors. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:16 pm
Let’s look at an example involving Jim, John, and Joan. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:13 am
Johns, St. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:13 am
Johns, St. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 11:18 am
In the John A. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:11 pm
Johnson, and John R. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 8:02 pm
James, John R. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:53 am
Johns County, Florida. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:53 am
Johns County, Florida. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:57 am
The plaintiff, identified in court papers as John Doe, was a civilian contractor and Army veteran who provided Arabic translation services to U.S. marines. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:21 am
How, exactly, does a contractor make his case when the witnesses against him are the justices? [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 8:03 pm
John Murchison is the reporter. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 5:57 pm
What Does it Mean to Be Misclassified as an Independent Contractor? [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:54 pm
By John W. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:38 am
Such persons truly are "self-employed" under the standard definition.If you are Misclassified as an Independent Contractor and Laid Off, You are Entitled to Unemployment Benefits - Coronavirus or NotHowever, there is a larger contingent of 1099 workers - they do work only for one company, and are not paid w-2 wages (often because the company does not want them "on the payroll. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
While, technically, the interim rule does not impose any new requirement on U.S. businesses, because all are already required to comply with U.S. export requirements, the interim rule does impose additional risks and liabilities on defense contractors because a violation of U.S. export laws could now also result in a breach of contract. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:30 am
The plaintiffs complain that the DOL compounds the problem in its final rule by “cherry pick[ing] language from cases it likes and discards cases it does not like. [read post]
